Hi,

yes in my PR I've replaced the way we pass the creadential, now it needs to
point to your filesystem, something like /home/$USER/my/key

HTH,
Andrea


On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sathyasuriya Priya
<sathyasur...@gmail.com>wrote:

> hi Andrea,
>
> I am facing some issues testing your PR
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/20
> The patch expects test.google-compute-engine.credential property to point
> to a file.
> But earlier I was using this property to have the entire private key as
> string.
>
> So some test is failing one way or the other.
>
> May be something is wrong with the way I applied the PR. I had to look into
> that.
>
> I am running late for my gsoc proposal. I will test it again after a week.
> If you could let me know how you store the private key, that would be good.
>
> Richard,
> Yes, I see the link to increase quota in 'quotas' page.
> I will request for it after testing Andrea's PR.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Richard Downer <
> richard.dow...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
> > Suriya, Andrea,
> >
> > It's also possible to request a quota increase from Google - there is a
> > form to do this somewhere inside the web console. I've had to go through
> > this process a couple of times, it was easy to fill in the form and both
> > times I have had my request approved in less than a day.
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> >
> > On 11 March 2014 09:00, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Suriya,
> > >
> > > unfortunately I can see your limit is pretty low (5 networks) and I
> > suspect
> > > the LiveTests are going to create more than 5. I've issued PR that
> > proposes
> > > a fix for this high number of networks created by jclouds (
> > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/20) but it is
> still
> > > unmerged.
> > > My suggestion is to either test my PR or, another "hack", you can try
> is
> > by
> > > specifying a property like
> > > "-Djclouds.google-compute-engine.networkName=my-network" (untested!)
> that
> > > should force jclouds to re-use always the same network.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > Andrea
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ignasi Barrera <
> > ignasi.barr...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > If you don't specify any template details, jclouds will try to find
> an
> > > > image known to work in the provider. The predicate you are seeing is
> > > > the default one defined for the GCE provider [1], but it seems that
> > > > it's not the appropriate one. That predicate should always find a
> > > > usable template (at least one with SSH enabled). Mind opening a JIRA
> > > > [2] issue to fix this?
> > > >
> > > > You can build the example by providing custom values to the template
> > > > builder. The Chef examples do that [3]. You don't have to stick to
> the
> > > > provider's default template. You can build the examples by
> instructing
> > > > the templateBuilder to look for a template that will work nice with
> > > > the example.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > HTH!
> > > >
> > > > Ignasi
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/blob/master/google-compute-engine/src/main/java/org/jclouds/googlecomputeengine/GoogleComputeEngineApiMetadata.java#L68-L69
> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS
> > > > [3]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/blob/master/chef-basics/src/main/java/org/apache/jclouds/examples/chef/basics/MainApp.java#L154
> > > >
> > > > On 11 March 2014 09:35, Sathyasuriya Priya <sathyasur...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > hi Ignasi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just an update and clarification on creating an example project for
> > > GCE.
> > > > > I started with the compute-basics example project. One important
> > change
> > > > > needed was to change the dependency versions to 1.7.1 in pom.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see that compute.listImages(), compute.listNodes() are working
> > fine.
> > > > > However, compute.createNodesInGroup() is failing with below error.
> > > > >
> > > > >>> adding node to group mygroup
> > > > > error: no image matched predicate:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> And(nullEqualToIsParentOrIsGrandparentOfCurrentLocation(),And(osFamily(gcel),osVersion(1[012].[01][04])))
> > > > >
> > > > > I was thinking the issue is with compute.templateBuilder(). Any way
> > to
> > > > > relax the predicate constraint ?
> > > > > I also tried to look into how live tests are able to create nodes
> in
> > > > > BaseComputeServiceLiveTest and see very similar code is being used.
> > > > > Any help/directions to look for is appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/blob/master/compute-basics/pom.xml
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Suriya
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Andrea Turli <
> > andrea.tu...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Suriya,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> for "network operations quota exceeded" please look at your '
> > > > >> https://console.developers.google.com/project/
> > > > <PROJECT_ID>/compute/quotas'
> > > > >> and try to clean up networks before running the liveTests.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Best,
> > > > >> Andrea
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ignasi Barrera
> > > > >> <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Thanks for checking!
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > If you are going to write something in you blog, that would be
> > > > excelent.
> > > > >> > Also, if you want to contribute your code examples to the
> > > > >> > jclouds-examples repo [1] or add a GCE starter guide to the main
> > > > >> > jclouds site [2], you're very welcome too! :)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Just let us know if we can help!
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples
> > > > >> > [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/tree/master/guides
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On 10 March 2014 12:11, Sathyasuriya Priya <
> > sathyasur...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > > Thanks Ignasi.
> > > > >> > > Yes, you are right. I don't need any changes to start using.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I am able to run the live tests following below instructions
> > [1],
> > > > [2].
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I feel some steps are not clear(for a new jclouds/gce user),
> and
> > > > would
> > > > >> > like
> > > > >> > > to post my steps in a bit more detailed manner(may be in my
> > blog).
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I will start looking at how to use in a separate example
> > > > >> > project(following
> > > > >> > > your suggestion [3]), and try to post them as well.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > In case if anybody is interested on result of my live tests:
> > > > >> > > Single OAuth live test passed:
> > > > >> > > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed:
> > > > 3.573
> > > > >> sec
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Some GCE live tests failed:
> > > > >> > > Tests run: 86, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 11
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Looks to me failures are due to network operations quota
> > exceeded.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > statusCode=403, message=FORBIDDEN, headers={}},
> > > > operationType=insert,
> > > > >> > > errors=[Error{code=QUOTA_EXCEEDED, message=Quota 'NETWORKS'
> > > > exceeded.
> > > > >> > > Limit: 5.0}]}
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [1]
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/tree/master/google-compute-engine
> > > > >> > > [2]
> > > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/tree/master/oauth
> > > > >> > > [3]
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg04369.html
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Ignasi Barrera <
> > > > >> > ignasi.barr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> Hi Suriya,
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Despite being in a different "labs" repository, the GCE
> > provider
> > > is
> > > > >> > >> also released as part of the regular release process. You'll
> > find
> > > > the
> > > > >> > >> release artifacts in Maven Central [1], so you download or
> > > include
> > > > >> > >> them as a dependency where needed. Moving the provider to the
> > > main
> > > > >> > >> repository should not be a blocker for downstream projects,
> as
> > > > long as
> > > > >> > >> they can use the released artifacts.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Creating the provider metadata class should be ideal, but I'm
> > not
> > > > sure
> > > > >> > >> if it would be a must. A "provider" in jclouds is just an
> > "api",
> > > > >> > >> exposed in a concrete location, with a set of defaults (check
> > > this
> > > > [2]
> > > > >> > >> core concept definition page). Many providers have common
> APIs
> > > > (think
> > > > >> > >> about OpenStack providers). While the API they expose is the
> > same
> > > > >> > >> (nova, swift, etc), the endpoints where they expose the api
> and
> > > > some
> > > > >> > >> defaults change. That is what the provider metadata
> describes.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Even though if there is no provider metadata describing a
> > > "concrete
> > > > >> > >> deployment of the api", you can still instanciate the
> provider,
> > > > using
> > > > >> > >> the ContextBuilder normally.
> > > > >> > >> You can use "google-compute-engine" as the provider id, and
> use
> > > the
> > > > >> > >> default endpoint, defined by the
> GoogleComputeEngineApiMetadata
> > > > [3].
> > > > >> > >> If you have the provider dependency in your classpath,
> jclouds
> > > will
> > > > >> > >> find it and pick it up.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> So, taking into account these things (if I am not missing
> > > > something)
> > > > >> > >> you should be already able to use the GCE provider without
> > having
> > > > to
> > > > >> > >> wait for those changes in the jclouds side.
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> HTH!
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> Ignasi
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> [1]
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.jclouds.labs%7Cgoogle-compute-engine%7C1.7.1%7Cjar
> > > > >> > >> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Core%20Concepts
> > > > >> > >> [3]
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/blob/master/google-compute-engine/src/main/java/org/jclouds/googlecomputeengine/GoogleComputeEngineApiMetadata.java#L78-L85
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> On 10 March 2014 09:18, Sathyasuriya Priya <
> > > sathyasur...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> > >> > Dear Jclouds developers,
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > I am Suriyapriya Veluchamy, currently an MS CS student at
> > NPU,
> > > > >> > Fremont,
> > > > >> > >> CA,
> > > > >> > >> > USA.
> > > > >> > >> > I am interested in the following GSOC project in Stratos.
> > > > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-480
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > I have some queries on the GCE support in jclouds, since
> this
> > > is
> > > > >> > needed
> > > > >> > >> for
> > > > >> > >> > Stratos to integrate with GCE.
> > > > >> > >> > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > I looked at a relevant email thread as well.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg04369.html
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > I understand the following JIRA issue is for moving the
> > > separate
> > > > GCE
> > > > >> > >> > project to the core project.
> > > > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-172
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > I would like to understand the complexity of this work,
> based
> > > on
> > > > >> > which I
> > > > >> > >> > would decide whether it could be part of my gsoc work. I
> have
> > > > come
> > > > >> up
> > > > >> > >> with
> > > > >> > >> > list of todo items, based on my analysis. Pls correct me or
> > add
> > > > >> other
> > > > >> > >> items
> > > > >> > >> > needed as well.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > 1. Create GCEProviderMetadata extending
> BaseProviderMetadata
> > > > >> (similar
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > >> > AWSEC2ProviderMetadata) - this is needed for
> > > > >> > >> > ContextBuilder.newBuilder(provider) to pick up GCE ?
> > > > >> > >> > 2. Move all the files (oauth, google-compute-engine) to
> > > > >> > >> > jclouds-providers-project.
> > > > >> > >> > 3. Hopefully, jclouds should pick up GCE as provider. Fix
> any
> > > > issues
> > > > >> > that
> > > > >> > >> > come up.
> > > > >> > >> > 4. Andrew Bayer's criticisms of OAuth code - I couldn't
> find
> > > the
> > > > >> > relevant
> > > > >> > >> > discussion/email related to this. Any idea if this is a
> > > critical
> > > > >> piece
> > > > >> > >> and
> > > > >> > >> > how much effort is needed to fix it.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > I am assuming other jclouds components are provider
> agnostic
> > > and
> > > > >> > >> shouldn't
> > > > >> > >> > break. Do you aware of any other code changes needed in
> other
> > > > >> > components.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > Also, I came across the GCE API java library from google.
> Any
> > > > idea
> > > > >> > why we
> > > > >> > >> > don't use it directly (instead rely on REST apis). May be
> for
> > > > OAuth
> > > > >> > >> support
> > > > >> > >> > alone we can make use of this ?
> > > > >> > >> >
> https://developers.google.com/compute/docs/api/api-lib/java
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > I was able to build jclouds-labs-google and run unittests
> > > > >> > successfully.
> > > > >> > >> > I will try to work on an example to make use of this
> project
> > > and
> > > > >> will
> > > > >> > >> > update.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> > Thanks
> > > > >> > >> > Suriya
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Richard Downer * Principal Engineer * Cloudsoft Corporation *
> > http://www.cloudsoftcorp.com
> > GitHub richardcloudsoft * Twitter @FrontierTown
> >
>

Reply via email to