Awesome. You rock! :)
El 25/07/2014 19:54, "Chris Custine" <chris.cust...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Yeah, “long” tests and things like that are exactly what I was thinking.
>
> I should add that there are several nuances that will require a review of
> all downstream labs projects etc., that inherit from jclouds-parent. Testng
> is flexible with regard to these groups, but certain things like @BeforeXXX
> annotations in parent test classes also respect group names and you must
> specifically name the group or tell them to run every time or else the bare
> @BeforeXXX annotations won't run. I see evidence from early jclouds code
> that this was known, but some more recent work doesn't take that into
> account.
>
> I am also capturing test statistics to compare the old and new approach to
> make sure we get the same tests run :-)
>
> I'll try to get this published in a PR so you guys can see the changes
> required and discuss options.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> --
> Chris Custine
>
>
> On July 25, 2014 at 11:29:43 AM, Ignasi Barrera (n...@apache.org) wrote:
>
> +1000 that would be highly appreciated.
>
> There has been a recent discussion to include a new kind of test group
> ("long" tests) and this will make that config much cleaner.
> El 25/07/2014 19:05, "Andrew Phillips" <aphill...@qrmedia.com> escribió:
>
> > I will open a PR with my code later today but I just wanted to throw
> this
> >> out there for comments.
> >>
> >
> > +1! I don't think there's any particular reason for us to stick with the
> > filename-based approach if this works now...
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > ap
> >
>
>
