On Aug 23, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote: > You explicitly used semvar-style version numbers. Is this an implicit > part of your proposal?
Nope. > We already agreed to a six-month major release > cadence and already do not break compatibility between minor (micro) > releases. What exactly do you propose other than using these new-style > version numbers? You’ve completely lost me at this point. You’ve even introduced new jargon. What’s a micro release? And I have no idea what "major" means to you. To the majority of people in the software industry a major release means incrementing the first number in the version. It seems you’ve overloaded the term major as its already commonly used in semver. But semver aside, what does “major” mean to you in this context? Can you please provide an example of the version numbers for the next 6 months? Everett
