I don't have any strong feeling about how we use JIRA :) I said
"often" because I usually do that just for issues I know that will be
fixed soon, or to force myself to fix them (in that case I assign them
to me).

If we communicate the road map in the wiki, there's no need to
duplicate the information. As said, I'm not very worried about how we
proceed with JIRA, so whatever option that has consensus works for me
:)

On 3 September 2014 17:28, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote:
>> I've often set the Fix Version before the issue was assigned or fixed,
>> because that's the way you can take a look at the road map in JIRA.
>
>
> Which version do you set, then? The next version? In that case, I agree with
> the other comments that this can give a misleading impression that issues
> will be fixed even if they're completely orphaned.
>
> We can try to make it easier to use JIRA to get a view of what is likely to
> be done by assigning a (tentative) fix version when an issue is assigned to
> a person and goes In Progress, as Gaul suggested.
>
> Would that help?
>
> ap

Reply via email to