I looked into filter-branch a while back just for this purpose.! If we
could retain history, that would be ideal. Let me get my SCM hat on and
take a look.

/jd

On 10/8/14, 7:43 AM, "Ignasi Barrera" <n...@apache.org> wrote:

>Actually, I'm still trying to keep the history with a couple more
>tests. If I can find a way, I'll post a howto on the wiki.
>
>On 8 October 2014 16:30, Ignasi Barrera <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The same happens to chef. I've tried to find a way to keep history,
>> but I haven't found any. Take into account that moving to the main
>> repo also implies a "restructure" of the project. In the case of Chef,
>> the "core" folder is moved to "apis", and the "enterprisechef" one to
>> "providers".
>>
>> On 8 October 2014 16:21, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote:
>>>> While this wouldn't retain history, we can cite the
>>>> jclouds-labs-openstack repo for history. Other ideas welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds good to me - what are we doing with jclouds-chef, which is also
>>> undergoing a similar merge at this time?
>>>
>>> Would filter-branch [1] help in preserving history in some way? Could
>>>we
>>> "convert" the repo to a branch on master and submit a PR to merge that?
>>>
>>> ap
>>>
>>> [1] http://git-scm.com/docs/git-filter-branch

Reply via email to