I looked into filter-branch a while back just for this purpose.! If we could retain history, that would be ideal. Let me get my SCM hat on and take a look.
/jd On 10/8/14, 7:43 AM, "Ignasi Barrera" <n...@apache.org> wrote: >Actually, I'm still trying to keep the history with a couple more >tests. If I can find a way, I'll post a howto on the wiki. > >On 8 October 2014 16:30, Ignasi Barrera <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The same happens to chef. I've tried to find a way to keep history, >> but I haven't found any. Take into account that moving to the main >> repo also implies a "restructure" of the project. In the case of Chef, >> the "core" folder is moved to "apis", and the "enterprisechef" one to >> "providers". >> >> On 8 October 2014 16:21, Andrew Phillips <aphill...@qrmedia.com> wrote: >>>> While this wouldn't retain history, we can cite the >>>> jclouds-labs-openstack repo for history. Other ideas welcome. >>> >>> >>> Sounds good to me - what are we doing with jclouds-chef, which is also >>> undergoing a similar merge at this time? >>> >>> Would filter-branch [1] help in preserving history in some way? Could >>>we >>> "convert" the repo to a branch on master and submit a PR to merge that? >>> >>> ap >>> >>> [1] http://git-scm.com/docs/git-filter-branch