What is the criteria for something to be in the jclouds/jclouds repo [1]?

Before we go moving any more code around or removing any more apis/providers we 
need to step back and have some agreed upon criteria for what belongs in 
jclouds/jclouds and what doesn’t. If we don’t do that our decisions are 
effectively arbitrary and the questions of “What to do about X?” will continue 
to come up.

I took a shot at addressing a topic like this in "Criteria for moving an 
api/provider from a labs repo to core” [2] but I got zero replies. People seem 
to be unwilling or uninterested in tackling this question and I think jclouds 
is suffering because of it. It’s puzzling to me because in email threads or IRC 
chats most everybody agrees that the labs repos are a failed experiment. So 
let’s flip it around and discuss what belongs in jclouds/jclouds instead.

I know for a fact that many contributors have an opinion on this. Let’s hear it!

Thanks,
Everett

[1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds

Reply via email to