TL;DR: if we want to stick with the current functionality set, I think the PR against the sshj driver seems like "the right one."

Just to confirm, this is a temporal fix until your PR to fix the agentproxy
bundle is in and released, right? Hopefully a fix for an eventual 1.9.1 and
to be reverted in 2.0.0?

Well, it depends. The current approach is The Right Way, I think, to set up agentproxy if we only want to support ssh-agent via netcat. From what I recall, that was essentially the idea when this was added?

*If* we decide that we want to support *all* the agentproxy options - netcat, JNA, pageant on Windows - *then* we should revert the current PR and modify the deps for both the sshj driver and karaf appropriately.

Testing that this latter scenario works will not be all that easy, though, I suspect.

Regards

ap

Reply via email to