We do not have a reproducible test case for the GSON issue so let's move
forward without upgrading it.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Alright - I'll see if there's any news on the GSON issue by tomorrow EU
> time and then cut an RC in the morning here.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > I've just seen you've already merged it. Thx!
> >
> > On 29 July 2015 at 12:12, Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > +1 to run the release, but please, can you kindly merge my AWS live
> > > tests PR then? :)
> > >
> > > On 29 July 2015 at 12:00, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Being selfish, I'd really like to have this out by next week so I can
> > >> upgrade to 1.9.1 without needing a SNAPSHOT, but if this is important
> > >> enough, I can muddle on with the SNAPSHOT for now...
> > >>
> > >> A.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Would be nice to resolve the GSON 2.3 issue:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-974
> > >>>
> > >>> I still do not undrestand this and will not have time to look at it
> > >>> today.  Can anyone else investigate?
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:43:57PM +0200, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> > >>> > So - what's left for 1.9.1? I'm ready to cut the release while
> > Ignasi's
> > >>> > traveling this week.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > A.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Andrew Gaul
> > >>> http://gaul.org/
> > >>>
> >

-- 
Andrew Gaul
http://gaul.org/

Reply via email to