Filed JCLOUDS-1026. Note that HP plans to continue offering a private cloud solution although obviously this is harder for us to test or even understand without access to the service. Hopefully someone at HP will step up here.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 08:44:27AM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > +1. Let's alsofile a jira issue to schedule the removal of the > hpcloud-compute provider. > El 25/10/2015 5:10, "Andrew Gaul" <g...@apache.org> escribió: > > > HP announced that it will sunset its public cloud offering on 31 Jan > > 2016: > > > > > > http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Grounded-in-the-Cloud/A-new-model-to-deliver-public-cloud/ba-p/6804409 > > > > I would like to remove support for hpcloud-objectstorage in master, > > which uses the legacy swift provider. The modern openstack-swift > > provider obsoletes the older provider and we have struggled to find > > someone to rebase HP support onto the newer provider. Having two > > providers also confuses users with some accidentally using the buggy and > > incomplete legacy provider instead of the modern provider. While HP > > will end service in a few months, I believe we should remove support in > > master now and users can continue to use 1.9.1 to access HP. Any > > objections? > > > > -- > > Andrew Gaul > > http://gaul.org/ > > -- Andrew Gaul http://gaul.org/
