+1 to propose merging it to 2.6. It looks like it would be easier to get a release there.
On 30 August 2016 at 16:00, Andrew Phillips <andr...@apache.org> wrote: >> Also, I don't think the exports are being added back, given the >> comments in the PR, so we should consider: > > > I just added this comment: > > https://github.com/google/gson/pull/916#issuecomment-243446866 > > @nacx: would it make sense to propose merging this into 2.6.x rather than > into master? It still leaves a breaking change in the 2.7.x releases, but > might meet with less opposition from the Gson team? > > Perhaps also worth asking in the Gson user group if there are any > recommendations how to work around/replace use of those classes? > > Regards > > ap
