ok I've misunderstood then. +1
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ignasi Barrera <ignasi.barr...@gmail.com> wrote: > But that PR will go only to master, right? There are many version bumps and > we don't want that in a bugfix version. > I'm just planning to release 2.0.x. > > On 15 February 2017 at 17:24, Andrea Turli <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ignasi, > > > > I think Packet can be promoted as well: API are quite clean and we have > the > > account for the live testing. > > > > I'd like to fix jclouds-karaf (namely having > > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/92) before the release. > > > > Otherwise no strong objections! > > > > Thanks, > > Andrea > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Zack Shoylev < > zack.shoy...@rackspace.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > ________________________________________ > > > From: Ignasi Barrera <n...@apache.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 3:37 AM > > > To: dev@jclouds.apache.org > > > Subject: Time to release jclouds 2.0.1 > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > I'd like to propose to release jclouds 2.0.1. There have been several > > > bugfixes and many improvements to our Azure ARM provider, including > > > the implementation of the security group features and their load > > > balancer API. We have also added the Packet (bare metal in the cloud) > > > and Vagrant providers in labs. > > > > > > All three providers are in a very good shape, and at least ARM and > > > vagrant are in a state that I'd say they could be promoted. However, > > > I'd like to have this release first so users can start testing them > > > and giving feedback, > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > If there are no objections, I'll volunteer to cut the release in a day > or > > > two. > > > > > > > > > > > > I. > > > > > >
