Sounds good to me. You have a detailed guide here (kudos to Zack!): https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/How+to+Promote+a+Provider
Please, follow it carefully, especially the part that explains the merge commit thing and how to merge it and open a PR (the PR is important because we can see how the history will look like by inspecting your fork). We don't want to mess it up here as reverting would be a PITA :) Thanks for taking care of this! On Mar 22, 2017 1:00 AM, "Andrew Gaul" <g...@apache.org> wrote: > Honestly, we could promote GCS to core today -- let's skip the > intermediate step. The URL signers are not much work which I could > implement some time next week. The InputStream hack uses multipart > upload to hack around a jclouds limitation but works fine from a user > perspective. Can you share your filter-branch commands so I can > preserve history? > > Related, we could promote Backblaze B2 from labs to core. From my > biased perspective this implementation has high quality. B2 lacks a > provider guide which I could also write next week. > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:12:29AM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > > Thanks for the links! > > > > I don't have a good overview on the status of all the blob store > > providers, so I trust your criteria. How significant are these issues, > > when it comes to the BlobStore abstraction? > > > > BTW, could we consider moving it to the "labs" repo? It does not make > > sense to maintain a separate repo just for that provider. Moving to > > labs does not require a groupId change, so it can be done in master > > and 2.0.x. > > > > On 21 March 2017 at 08:45, Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org> wrote: > > > We have a meta-issue[1] tracking exactly this! From my perspective, > GCS > > > lacks temporary signed URLs[2] and has an involved issue with > > > InputStream payloads[3] which make its implementation inferior to other > > > blobstore providers. I can sprint on the former for 2.1.0 but the > > > latter requires some effort. It would be great to eliminate > > > jclouds-labs-google from a release process so perhaps we could overlook > > > these issues? > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-944 > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-902 > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-912 > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 08:21:44AM +0100, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > > >> I'm just wondering if we should think about promoting GCS in the next > > >> major. And if not, what's missing? > > >> > > >> > > >> I. > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Gaul > > > http://gaul.org/ > > -- > Andrew Gaul > http://gaul.org/ >
