Hi Michelle, The proposal looks great! It is a very good starting point.
Regarding the mapping between the portable model and the provider one (message structure, etc) you'll probably have to define a set of transformation functions in each provider. Regarding this, the BlobStore abstraction and the Compute one work a bit different: the former just provides the interface and lets each implementation transform the data, and the latter provides an adapter layer [1], so implementations can be written using exclusively the provider model, and the adapter layer will take care of calling the transformation functions where needed (they just need to be bound to the Guice context). This could affect the design of the abstraction and how implementations are coded, so you probably want to think about this when working on the proposal. I. [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/compute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/compute/ComputeServiceAdapter.java On Mar 31, 2017 7:37 AM, "Michelle Zhang" <zhangqiangcan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I've finished my proposal for GSoC problem "Create Message Queue > Abstraction". The problem link: https://issues.apache.org/jira > /browse/JCLOUDS-865?jql=labels%20%3D%20gsoc2017%20AND%20proj > ect%20%3D%20jclouds > > I have discussed with mentor Andrew Gaul and we decide to share it here to > get more good ideas. Please give me more suggestions! ;-) Thank you so much! > > proposal link: https://docs.google.com/docume > nt/d/1QEy2DsLijWf5g6CmmOegzCEbF_CBE3dM767sJb7AY0Y/edit?usp=sharing > > Thanks, > ~Michelle >
