I am happy that you resolved your email issues. You commented on my partially async design but you have not shown that your fully async design is actually faster. Please provide benchmarks as requested here:
https://github.com/andrewgaul/s3proxy/pull/220#discussion_r116132467 Adding a new HTTP code path has a higher barrier for inclusion than a simple bug fix. The jclouds team might need to maintain this code for a long time so the burden of proof is on you to show that we need it. On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:20:05AM -0000, kishore kumar wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I have reviewed your pull request and the approach you specified doesn't > solve what we are trying to address. I replied to the pull request. -- Andrew Gaul http://gaul.org/
