Can anyone confirm this apparent lack of support for the 307 redirect? Such handling is critical for our use-case (new hardware under development). We'd be interested in supplying a patch if we can confirm this functionality is not yet implemented.
- Missing support in jclouds s3 API to handle “307 temporar... brent . williams
- Re: Missing support in jclouds s3 API to handle “307... Andrew Gaul
- Re: Missing support in jclouds s3 API to handle ... Ignasi Barrera