Hi all, Just copying the Apache Brooklyn community on this.
As Ignasi mentioned [2] Brooklyn uses jclouds' OSGI support. I am not saying we need to do anything but it might be worth us at least being aware of the ongoing discussion. Regards Geoff [2] https://github.com/apache/jclouds/pull/78#issuecomment-650507931 On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 17:21, Robert Varga <n...@hq.sk> wrote: > > On 06/07/2020 14:59, Andrew Gaul wrote: > > A contributor recently submitted a pull request to jclouds which > > proposes unshadowing gson, part of our efforts to modernizing our > > dependencies: > > > > https://github.com/apache/jclouds/pull/78 > > > > However, our team lacks the OSGi expertise to review this change. Could > > someone from the Karaf team help us out? The Karaf project took over > > maintenance of jclouds-karaf last year and we prefer not to break any > > users: > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@karaf.apache.org/msg13623.html > > > > Hello, > > I cannot contribute to an explicit review, sorry. > > I would suggest steering clear of 2.8.6 due to a number of OSGi > packaging mistakes: > https://github.com/google/gson/issues/1601 > https://github.com/google/gson/issues/1602 > > We are using non-shaded gson-2.8.5 in OpenDaylight for a few years now > without any issues -- the latest packaged features.xml lives here: > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/opendaylight/odlparent/odl-gson/7.0.3/odl-gson-7.0.3-features.xml > > Regards, > Robert >
