+1 to Everett's proposed change, and +1 (binding). As long as the Andrews are ok with the change I don't think we need a new vote for this.
On 30/07/2013, Everett Toews <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I didn't catch it before but do we need to specify "72 business hours" > instead of just "72 hours" in the 3.5. Voting Timeframes section? > > My understanding has always been that it's business hours. Apache Voting [1] > isn't any more specific on the subject. > > Would making that change mean we need a new vote? > > Everett > > On Jul 30, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > >> Ok, let's have a vote on the proposed project bylaws at >> https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Bylaws. The vote will operate by the lazy >> 2/3 majority standard specified in the bylaws themselves) (at least 3 >> binding +1s, and at least twice as many binding +1s as binding -1s). The >> vote will be open for 72 hours - i.e., until 9am PDT on Friday, August >> 2nd. >> Any committer or mentor has a binding vote. Thanks! >> >> I am +1 binding, fwiw. >> >> A. > >
