Yeah, if the abstractions slip, that's not the end of the world, but if we *can* get them, I'd really like to.
A. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Everett Toews <[email protected]>wrote: > I just updated a handful of issues that I'm familiar with for what I think > will be in 1.7.0. I then did the following search so see what was planned > to be included in 1.7.0. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20JCLOUDS%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.7.0%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open > > Currently we're sitting at 35 open issues. The 3 abstraction issues are > doozies but other than those I think it's doable. > > Everett > > > On Jul 2, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > > So, resurrecting this thread - we seem to have a general consensus on a 6 > > week or so cadence for maintenance releases, but no one's really added > > anything more to the 1.7 roadmap, either on the wiki or on JIRA, so far > as > > I can see. I'd really like to define the scope within the next few weeks, > > so that we can figure out the timeframe from there. > > > > A. > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Andrew Phillips <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Version strings: semver looks right for jclouds (SDKs, maven > packaging), > >>> however it might make sense to also "unofficially" name feature > releases > >>> with a month/year. > >>> > >> > >> Note that the "-incubating" suffix, which is also present for release > >> versions such as our recent 1.6.1-incubating, is not semver-compliant. > >> > >> Not that that's something I think we need to be too concerned about, > but... > >> > >> ap > >> > >
