Ignasi <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Noorul,
>
> Just a follow up. I've been able to isolate (I think) the issue and
> I've opened the corresponding JIRA [1]. I asked the chef-dev mailing
> list [2] to see if someone can give us the details of how to properly
> sign the URLs that are failing. It seems that some change may be
> required in the signing filter [3].
>
> Let's see if we can get this fixed!
>

Thank you!

Thanks and Regards
Noorul

>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-254
> [2] http://lists.opscode.com/sympa/arc/chef-dev/2013-08/msg00034.html
> [3] 
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-chef/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/jclouds/chef/filters/SignedHeaderAuth.java
>
> On 26 August 2013 16:54, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ok, I just added a few cookbooks more to my Hosted Chef account and
>> the download is failing the same way.
>> I still haven't figured out what can be failing in the signature (it
>> shouldn't have changed since Chef 0.10), so any help would be
>> appreciated!
>>
>> On 26 August 2013 15:55, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> The problem appears in the "getResourceContents" api call. After
>>> debugging for a while I haven't found an explanation. It fails
>>> randomly with random resources, and there is no pattern for that :(
>>> Sometimes it fails to download a root file resource, sometimes not.
>>> Sometimes it fails downloading a recipe file, sometimes it just works.
>>>
>>> I executed the live test suite against a Chef 0.10.8, and against
>>> Enterprise Chef and all tests are passing, so I assume it might be an
>>> issue in Chef 11; otherwise I can not explain why the same resource
>>> sometimes is downloaded and sometimes it is not. The authentication
>>> mechanism hasn't changed, and if it works for Chef 0.10 and Enterprise
>>> Chef, it should work for Chef 11 too (or at least have some
>>> deterministic behavior).
>>>
>>>
>>> To properly reflect that in the live tests, I've separated the
>>> "testListCookbooks" in two different tests: "testListCookbooks" and
>>> "testDownloadCookbooks". If you update my branch, you should get those
>>> changes.
>>>
>>> I'll search if there is any open issue and file a new one if appropriate.
>>>
>>> Anyway, let me know if you find something that could help getting rid of 
>>> this!
>>>
>>>
>>> Ignasi
>>>
>>>
>>> On 26 August 2013 14:29, Noorul Islam K M <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Ignasi <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot for your feedback Noorul!
>>>>>
>>>>> You can run the 'core' live tests as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> mvn clean install -pl core -Plive \
>>>>>   -Dtest.chef.endpoint=<you chef server url> \
>>>>>   -Dtest.chef.identity=<identity> \
>>>>>   -Dtest.chef.credential=<path to the PEM private key>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think, I get the same as you
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Test suite progress: tests succeeded: 41, failed: 1, skipped: 1.
>>>> Tests run: 43, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 187.134 
>>>> sec <<< FAILURE!
>>>>
>>>> Results :
>>>>
>>>> Failed tests:   testListCookbooks(org.jclouds.chef.ChefApiLiveTest): <?xml 
>>>> version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><Error><Code>SignatureDoesNotMatch
>>>> </Code><Message>The request signature we calculated does not match the 
>>>> signature you provided. Check your key and signing method.</Message><S
>>>> tringToSignBytes></StringToSignBytes><RequestId>g2gCZAATYm9va3NoZWxmQDEyNy4wLjAuMWgDYgAABWFiAAef4WIAC6/x</RequestId><HostId></HostId><Signatu
>>>> reProvided>hRkpN1RzN 
>>>> /pGeMmyXnDtRZUNnI=</SignatureProvided><StringToSign>GET(..)
>>>>
>>>> Tests run: 43, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1
>>>>
>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>> Noorul
>>>>
>>>>> And if you have a hosted chef account, you can run them like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> mvn clean install -pl enterprise -Plive \
>>>>>   -Dtest.enterprisechef.org=<you organization name> \
>>>>>   -Dtest.enterprisechef.identity=<identity> \
>>>>>   -Dtest.enterprisechef.credential=<path to the PEM private key>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26 August 2013 14:10, Noorul Islam K M <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Ignasi <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Noorul, I've just uploaded to my branch [1] a change that registers a
>>>>>>> custom Map deserializer to allow repeated keys. It just keeps the last
>>>>>>> one, which seems to be the one with the right content. You can take a
>>>>>>> look at the commit [2] if you want to know the details.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've tried the api call that was failing to you, and now it works and
>>>>>>> the cookbook is properly deserialized. However, the live test to list
>>>>>>> all cookbooks is still failing due to a signature error (which is
>>>>>>> weird, because the signature is generated in a generic filter [3] that
>>>>>>> applies to all requests).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it might be related to my Chef 11 installation. To make sure,
>>>>>>> could you update the branch and run the live tests, or try to list the
>>>>>>> cookbooks using the ChefApi and ChefServer, and share the results?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tested these methods after pulling latest from your branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> getCookbook()
>>>>>> listCookbooks()
>>>>>> listEnvironmentCookbooks()
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everything seems to be working fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do I run live tests? Is this documented somewhere?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>> Noorul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ignasi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/nacx/jclouds-chef/tree/245-live-tests
>>>>>>> [2] 
>>>>>>> https://github.com/nacx/jclouds-chef/commit/59115b5a08197547cf74f6831e265fe67a3b9ab8
>>>>>>> [3] 
>>>>>>> https://github.com/nacx/jclouds-chef/blob/245-live-tests/core/src/main/java/org/jclouds/chef/filters/SignedHeaderAuth.java
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 26 August 2013 12:24, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> As soon as possible.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My branch depends on issue JCLOUDS-246 [1]. Since changes are not
>>>>>>>> backward compatible (just a massive package and artifactId renaming),
>>>>>>>> I sent a mail last week to let users express an opinion on the change
>>>>>>>> [2]. I plan to merge it this week, since there are no opinions
>>>>>>>> against, and as soon as it is merged, I'll merge my current branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You could expect to have it merged by the end of the week, if I finish
>>>>>>>> the fix by then (which I hope :)). I plan to upload to my branch the
>>>>>>>> fix this afternoon; I'll let you know when I have something usable so
>>>>>>>> you can test and validate it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ignasi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-246
>>>>>>>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/5jm2ivpypewnov3h
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 26 August 2013 12:02, Noorul Islam K M <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Ignasi <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just tested the openssl cookbook and found that the returned Metadata
>>>>>>>>>> has a duplicate key in the recipes list. I've pasted the json here 
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> so you can have a look.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll ping Chef people to see if it is an issue in their side, and try
>>>>>>>>>> to build a workaround in the meanwhile.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to know, usually how long it takes something to get into
>>>>>>>>> upstream from the branch that you are working on?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can provide any help needed to make this working but need to be sure
>>>>>>>>> that I can use this in production as soon as possible.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>>> Noorul
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://pastie.org/8270391
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 26 August 2013 08:28, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Noorul!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is definitely the intention to support Chef 11 as soon as 
>>>>>>>>>>> possible. I
>>>>>>>>>>> have a work in progress branch [1] where I fixed all Enterprise 
>>>>>>>>>>> Chef live
>>>>>>>>>>> tests and also made all live tests pass against a Chef 11 except the
>>>>>>>>>>> "listCookbooks" one.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I get the exact same error than you, and it happens when 
>>>>>>>>>>> deserializing the
>>>>>>>>>>> json for the cookbook into the CookbookVersion object. It seems 
>>>>>>>>>>> that the
>>>>>>>>>>> Chef Server is returning a duplicate key in the json structure 
>>>>>>>>>>> (although it
>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't because we are forcing by default a 0.10 version header 
>>>>>>>>>>> to make it
>>>>>>>>>>> return the same responses than in previous versions), and the json 
>>>>>>>>>>> parser
>>>>>>>>>>> fails to build the corresponding map.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm currently working on this but it's taking longer than expected, 
>>>>>>>>>>> so any
>>>>>>>>>>> help would be much appreciated. If you could build my branch and 
>>>>>>>>>>> enable
>>>>>>>>>>> jclouds wire logging [2], you would be able to see the json 
>>>>>>>>>>> returned for
>>>>>>>>>>> your cookbook. Could you share that json? Also, any help 
>>>>>>>>>>> tracking/isolating
>>>>>>>>>>> the error (or patch :)) is appreciated too!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ignasi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/nacx/jclouds-chef/tree/245-live-tests
>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>> http://jclouds.incubator.apache.org/documentation/reference/jclouds-logging/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> El 26/08/2013 07:27, "Noorul Islam K M" <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We are planning to use jclouds-chef library to talk to community 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chef
>>>>>>>>>>>> Server 11. In my initial testings, I get the following exception 
>>>>>>>>>>>> when I
>>>>>>>>>>>> try to get cookbook details using
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> api.getCookbook("openssl", "1.0.2")
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> |  java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: duplicate key: openssl
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument(Preconditions.java:119)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.common.collect.RegularImmutableMap.<init>(RegularImmutableMap.java:67)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMap$Builder.fromEntryList(ImmutableMap.java:249)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMap$Builder.build(ImmutableMap.java:235)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.jclouds.json.internal.NullFilteringTypeAdapterFactories$MapTypeAdapter.read(NullFilteringTypeAdapterFactories.java:313)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.jclouds.json.internal.NullFilteringTypeAdapterFactories$MapTypeAdapter.read(NullFilteringTypeAdapterFactories.java:278)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$1.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:93)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:172)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$1.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:93)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> com.google.gson.internal.bind.ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory$Adapter.read(ReflectiveTypeAdapterFactory.java:172)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:795)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:761)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at com.google.gson.Gson.fromJson(Gson.java:710)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.jclouds.json.internal.GsonWrapper.fromJson(GsonWrapper.java:47)
>>>>>>>>>>>>         at 
>>>>>>>>>>>> org.jclouds.http.functions.ParseJson.apply(ParseJson.java:86)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> README.md says that
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It currently supports versions 0.9 and 0.10 of the standard Chef 
>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>> apis, and an initial and very basic (still in progress) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the user and organization api of the Hosted and Private Chef
>>>>>>>>>>>> flavours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that the issue I am facing is because I am using Chef 
>>>>>>>>>>>> server 11.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any plans to officially support Chef Server 11 in near 
>>>>>>>>>>>> future?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Noorul

Reply via email to