> + */
> +package org.jclouds.openstack.nova.v2_0.domain.zonescoped;
> +
> +import com.google.common.base.Objects;
> +import java.beans.ConstructorProperties;
> +
> +/**
> + * @author Inbar Stolberg
> + */
> +public class AvailabilityZone {
> +
> + private final String name;
> + private final ZoneState zoneState;
> +
> + @ConstructorProperties({
> + "zoneName" , "zoneState"
If I am not wrong, the current values for the `@ConstructorProperties` are the
right ones. At least the ones jclouds expects. Those values are used to
deserialize the response. The
[GsonModule](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/jclouds/json/config/GsonModule.java#L123-L124)
configures a [specific
strategy](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/jclouds/json/internal/NamingStrategies.java#L200-L250)
to deserialize responses when the constructor has arguments.
So the values in the annotation are the right ones to get the response properly
deserialized, but perhaps the name of the field and the constructor parameters
could be changed to keep a more purist naming convention.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/179/files#r6997339
