+1
All builds fine, licenses and notices in order and keys check out Rob On 6/13/12 3:19 PM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.1. > >This is the second vote to be called. >Issues arising in the first cycle are described at http://s.apache.org/pt > >Everyone, not just committers and PMC members, is invited to test and >vote. (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's.) > >This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of Fuseki. > >Versions: > >jena-parent 1 >jena-iri 0.9.1 >jena-core 2.7.1 >jena-arq 2.9.1 >jena-tdb 0.9.1 >apache-jena 2.7.1 (the combined distribution) > >jena-fuseki 0.2.2 (separate binary) > >Staging repository: >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-235/ > >Proposed dist/ area: >http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.7.1/dist/ > >Keys: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > >SVN tag: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.1/ > >NB. The SVN tag picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well. >The source-release does not. jena-sdb and jena-larq are >not included in the binaries. > > >Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > >This vote will be open to the end of >Saturday 16/June 23:59 UTC >(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > Andy > > >Checking needed: > > is the GPG signature fine? > is there a source archive? > can the source archive really be built? > is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > check the dependencies. > do all the tests work? > if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources?
