On 8/16/2012 1:11 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
TDB 0.9 supports transactions. This sort of CCME is not possible when
using transactions which support multiple readers *and* a single
writer concurrently as well as readers from previous generations of
database, which see a consistent view. It's isolation level
"serialized".
("is not" == "should not" of course, but judging by your other emails
you are not using transactions).
we still need to evaluate how much change it would be to make use of the
new features.
Jeremy
