[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13452791#comment-13452791
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-189:
------------------------------------
Claude - yes, a separate JIRA would be easier from my point-of-view.
I'd like to hear about your ideas for RESTful operation - maybe a discussion on
a JIRA or on email.
Fuseki does have a additional code for handling direct naming and operations on
the dataset URL itself. This (SPARQL_UberServlet*) is not active by default
yet because I also want to put in place an approach to security (looking at
Apache Shiro) and it may make it hard to filter fro security if the kind of
operation (R or W) is within the query string.
See also JENA-201 (Fuseki delivered as a WAR file)
> Jena 3 / technical
> ------------------
>
> Key: JENA-189
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-189
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Brainstorming
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>
> This is a JIRA to discuss and collect technical changes to Jena that would
> warrant a "Jena3" whether an incompatible change or just sufficient changes
> to mean bumping the major version number is best.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
