Simon,

It's probably in 2.7.4 as well.

I've improved the code based on the stacktrace and on code analysis. It'll be in tonight's build. It now tracks when the write transaction is active or is no longer subject to change (the latter is when the error is occuring)

If it is what I think it is, then a test case will need one transaction committed and queued in the journal and then at least two transactions (2 read or 1 read, 1 write) concurrently active all on the same area of the graph. The stack trace has at least 2 write transactions committed and queued; either 2 and it's a writer or 3 and it's a reader.

(Or there is concurrent access inside one active transaction in which case all bets are off.)

It would be possible to remove the block tracking but I'd rather not. Such internal details as operations tracking can be useful and it is hard to retro fit later.

        Andy

On 15/10/12 18:28, Simon Helsen wrote:
Hi everyone,

in some of our testing, we are still working with 2.7.1, so I am trying to
figure out if the issue observed might be fixed in 2.7.4 or not, or, if we
are making a mistake ourselves. I don't have a test case right now because
the problem only surfaced in a heavy-duty (200+ clients) 5-day reliability
test. So, I currently have no idea about the circumstances or even a hint
on how to reproduce, but perhaps someone will recognize this issue. I
suspect the problem is caused by our usage of

At some point in our code (this is in the SecuringFilter.getPropertyFor
you see below in the stack trace), we have this

results = this.datasetGraphTransaction.find(graphNode, Node.ANY, property,
Node.ANY);

where

this.datasetGraphTransaction = (DatasetGraphTransaction)
(queryContext.getDataset().asDatasetGraph());

is created at the beginning of the transaction. Everything you see below
sits in a read transaction.

I also looked at the code in BlockMgrJournal and I am not sure what the
purpose is of final private Set<Long> iteratorBlocks = new HashSet<Long>()
; in which the concurrent mod seems to happen. Is it only for logging
purposes?

thanks

Simon


Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
     at
java.util.HashMap$AbstractMapIterator.checkConcurrentMod(HashMap.java:122)
     at java.util.HashMap$AbstractMapIterator.makeNext(HashMap.java:127)
     at java.util.HashMap$KeyIterator.next(HashMap.java:200)
     at java.util.HashMap.analyzeMap(HashMap.java:724)
     at java.util.HashMap.rehash(HashMap.java:710)
     at java.util.HashMap.rehash(HashMap.java:743)
     at java.util.HashMap.putImpl(HashMap.java:629)
     at java.util.HashMap.put(HashMap.java:607)
     at java.util.HashSet.add(HashSet.java:95)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.transaction.BlockMgrJournal.getReadIterator(BlockMgrJournal.java:149)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.transaction.BlockMgrJournal.getReadIterator(BlockMgrJournal.java:146)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.base.block.BlockMgrWrapper.getReadIterator(BlockMgrWrapper.java:58)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.base.recordbuffer.RecordBufferPageMgr.getReadIterator(RecordBufferPageMgr.java:53)
     at com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.base.recordbuffer.RecordRangeIterator.<init>
(RecordRangeIterator.java:82)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.base.recordbuffer.RecordRangeIterator.iterator(RecordRangeIterator.java:40)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.index.bplustree.BPlusTree.iterator(BPlusTree.java:383)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.index.bplustree.BPlusTree.iterator(BPlusTree.java:366)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.index.TupleIndexRecord.findWorker(TupleIndexRecord.java:164)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.index.TupleIndexRecord.findOrScan(TupleIndexRecord.java:84)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.index.TupleIndexRecord.performFind(TupleIndexRecord.java:78)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.index.TupleIndexBase.find(TupleIndexBase.java:91)
     at com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.index.TupleTable.find(TupleTable.java:172)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.nodetable.NodeTupleTableConcrete.find(NodeTupleTableConcrete.java:169)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.nodetable.NodeTupleTableConcrete.find(NodeTupleTableConcrete.java:157)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.nodetable.NodeTupleTableConcrete.findAsNodeIds(NodeTupleTableConcrete.java:146)
     at com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.store.QuadTable.find(QuadTable.java:87)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.store.DatasetGraphTDB.findInSpecificNamedGraph(DatasetGraphTDB.java:108)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.core.DatasetGraphBaseFind.findNG(DatasetGraphBaseFind.java:59)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.core.DatasetGraphBaseFind.find(DatasetGraphBaseFind.java:48)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.migrate.DatasetGraphTrackActive.find(DatasetGraphTrackActive.java:165)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.SecuringFilter.getPropertyFor(SecuringFilter.java:156)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.SecuringFilter.getContextFor(SecuringFilter.java:149)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.SecuringFilter.checkContextFor(SecuringFilter.java:136)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.SecuringFilter.accept(SecuringFilter.java:94)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.SecuringFilter.accept(SecuringFilter.java:1)
     at org.openjena.atlas.iterator.Iter$3.hasNext(Iter.java:187)
     at org.openjena.atlas.iterator.Iter$6.hasNext(Iter.java:386)
     at org.openjena.atlas.iterator.Iter$3.hasNext(Iter.java:181)
     at org.openjena.atlas.iterator.Iter$4.hasNext(Iter.java:295)
     at org.openjena.atlas.iterator.Iter$3.hasNext(Iter.java:181)
     at org.openjena.atlas.iterator.Iter.hasNext(Iter.java:808)
     at
org.openjena.atlas.iterator.RepeatApplyIterator.hasNext(RepeatApplyIterator.java:58)
     at org.openjena.atlas.iterator.Iter$4.hasNext(Iter.java:295)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIterPlainWrapper.hasNextBinding(QueryIterPlainWrapper.java:54)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIteratorBase.hasNext(QueryIteratorBase.java:108)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIterRepeatApply.makeNextStage(QueryIterRepeatApply.java:106)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIterRepeatApply.hasNextBinding(QueryIterRepeatApply.java:65)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIteratorBase.hasNext(QueryIteratorBase.java:108)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIterConvert.hasNextBinding(QueryIterConvert.java:65)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIteratorBase.hasNext(QueryIteratorBase.java:108)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIteratorWrapper.hasNextBinding(QueryIteratorWrapper.java:40)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIteratorBase.hasNext(QueryIteratorBase.java:108)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIteratorWrapper.hasNextBinding(QueryIteratorWrapper.java:40)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.iterator.QueryIteratorBase.hasNext(QueryIteratorBase.java:108)
     at
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.engine.ResultSetStream.hasNext(ResultSetStream.java:72)
     at com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.InternalResultSet.<init>
(InternalResultSet.java:26)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.tdb.JenaTxTdbProvider.performSelect(JenaTxTdbProvider.java:1396)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.tdb.JenaTxTdbProvider$15.run(JenaTxTdbProvider.java:1541)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.tdb.JenaTxTdbProvider$15.run(JenaTxTdbProvider.java:1)
     at
com.ibm.team.jfs.rdf.internal.jena.tdb.JenaTxTdbProvider.storeOperation(JenaTxTdbProvider.java:1968)


Reply via email to