Per previous discussions for 2.10.0 release I have been experimenting with maven a little and propose the following new maven module:
jena–libs This is a POM only module which serves as a convenience artifact, specifying this artifact would pull in the standard Jena libraries – Core, IRI, ARQ, TDB and SDB Does this address what we are trying to do? If so I can go ahead and commit this so we can play around with this. Rob ps. I also wonder whether it might be worth adding the following though I am less keen on this: jena–libs-onejar This is a JAR module which again serves as a convenience artifact, this would use the maven shade plugin to build a single uber jar from the jena-libs module. The intention is to provide a convenience binary for those who don't use dependency management systems like maven. They can download and add a single JAR to the class path and not have to worry about ensuring they have the right dependencies. This may be nice to have but I don't know whether we should encourage this, having uber JARs can also cause problems since it can hide the fact that you have multiple versions of a dependency on your class path from easy inspection.
