Hi guys,

I have a generic question about having large strings as objects in 
triples. It is not entirely clear to me what the ramifications are if TDB 
indexes triples with very large objects (typically of some string type). 
We currently have an internal discussion about this because it seems that 
in the past we essentially blocked triples with a very large string object 
to end up in TDB in the first place (right now, the artificial limit is a 
string length of 1024). In most cases, clients would not put any fancy 
filters on such large strings in their sparql query, but they would still 
want to retrieve the large string object. Still, even in this use-case, it 
is not clear how this would negatively affect the performance both in 
terms of memory and cpu.

thanks

Simon

Reply via email to