Right, so I looked at this and we are not using the event system here. I
think it was only used as a short-hand perhaps with the belief it would
have been faster. So no concerns on our end
thanks
Simon
From:
Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
To:
dev@jena.apache.org,
Date:
02/12/2013 03:43 AM
Subject:
Re: Jena 2.10.0 - ready yet?
Simon - thanks for the report
On 11/02/13 23:10, Simon Helsen wrote:
> 1) we had a few usages of org.openjena.atlas, but it was straightforward
> to adjust the package names. I am not anticipating significant effects
on
> our own clients since they should not be using these APIs. If they do,
the
> fix is simple
org.apache.jena.riot will become an offical API - might take a release
or so to completely settle down with minor changes from feedback,
although that's more likely to be adding convenience operations than
anything else.
> 2) we had a few occurrences of BulkUpdateHandler which is only
deprecated
> and seems simple to change. Same issue with client dependencies.
Do you use the event system in conjunction with bulk updates?
The helper conversion ode is in com.hp.hpl.jena.graph.GraphUtil. Just
set OldStyle to false (some tests will then fail). When set false, you
get one event per triple change, no special events for different kinds
of add or delete.
As a warning - we will need to switch to simplified events but the
default implementation is unwind these into per triple events anyway so
it's less of a change than might appear.
Andy
