[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13655571#comment-13655571
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-427:
------------------------------------
For remote monitoring, it would be useful to optionally expose an additional
service for each dataset which responded to requests in a simple fashion for
liveness. An addition "system" graph and query interface might be
theoretically attractive but a fixed plain text page of cheap to provide stats
is a lot easier to use in other (non SPARQL aware) tools.
> Statistics for Fuseki usage.
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-427
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-427
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ARQ, Fuseki, TDB
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Labels: gsoc2013, mentor
>
> Between ARQ and Fuseki, there could be statistics on usage gathered for
> exposure via JMX.
> ARQ collects only a basic count.
> Fuseki could collect per dataset.
> What statistics would be useful? How would they be JMX-named?
> Statistics are useful for debugging and for lomng term system monitorings.
> Please add suggestions to the JIRA.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
