+1 Looks good to me
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.10.1. > > Everyone, not just committers and PMC members, is invited to test and vote. > (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's.) > > This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of Fuseki. > > Versions: > > jena-parent 6 > jena-iri 0.9.6 > jena-core 2.10.1 > jena-arq 2.10.1 > jena-tdb 0.10.1 > apache-jena 2.10.1 (the combined distribution) > apache-jena-libs 2.10.1 (combined maven artifact) > jena-fuseki 0.2.7 (separate binary) > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-002/ > > Proposed dist/ area: > http://people.apache.org/~andy/dist-jena-2.10.1/ > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > SVN tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.10.1/ > > NB. The SVN tag picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well. > The source-release does not. jena-sdb and jena-larq are > not included in the binaries. > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > This vote will be open to the end of > Tuesday 2013-May-14 23:59 UTC > (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > Andy > > > Checking needed: > > is the GPG signature fine? > is there a source archive? > can the source archive really be built? > is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > check the dependencies. > do all the tests work? > if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources?
