[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13700063#comment-13700063
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-483:
------------------------------------
Thanks for the patch, which I've applied - your usage seems to be more like
remote HTTP access to the server using SPARQL protocol or Graph Store Protocol.
Even the client-libraries (in ARQ) would impose a burden on you if you already
have the RDF to add in a stream bytes that just needs posting to the server.
I'll make the JIRA "resolved" as the patch is processed but if you continue to
add more patches, that would be most appreciated.
> Improve Javadoc for Fuseki artifact.
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-483
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Fuseki
> Affects Versions: Fuseki 0.2.7
> Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
> Fix For: Fuseki 0.2.8
>
> Attachments: JENA-483.patch
>
>
> I am currently using the Fuseki 0.2.7 artifact via it's Java API.
> It is very unclear what should be going on and how I should be using the API.
> With help from you guys on list ;), I am going to make it a priority to
> document as much of the module as I can. I will upload the patch here once I
> have finished.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
