Yes we got a bit busy with fixing some issues that came up. I have some thoughts about JDBC which I will send in a separate email.
Bumping to 2.11.0 does seem appropriate. Rob On 8/23/13 11:04 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >We were discussing a release > >http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201307.mbox/%3C51F8EEE7. >4040109%40apache.org%3E > >and then things seem to have got rather busy. > >I think we should try for a release even if everything isn't done, then >release again if necessary. There are some great new things already in >the pipeline. > >We have a number of things and I think this is worth bumping to 2.11. > >* New website > >* jena-text >* jena-jdbc > >I'm assuming that these are not in download, they are in trunk though, >so released via maven and it all forms part of one release vote. > >jena-text drags in Lucene which might be considered a bit big to put >into the distribution (not something that worries me that much). > >jena-jdbc: >Is there documentation? >(at least something an announcment can point to :-) > >And also: > >* jena-client >Include if ready, not blocking. > >* jena-security > >Not sure the roadmap is here. Claude - thoughts? > >It can be anything from in trunk, so part of the formal release if the >legals are done, to advertising and keeping as a SNAPSHOT for now but >version-fixed to 2.11.0. > >(ps you want to depend on apache-jena-libs, not apache-jena) > > Andy > > > > >
