Rob,
+1 - Good idea.
TDB might as well go to 1.0.0; ditto Fuseki to 1.0.0.
0.x.y version numbers seem to concern some people.
TDB versioning has the added input that the file format on disk is
important, so having it's own version number makes sense to me. Fuseki
relies sufficiently heavily on TDB that its version number is entangled
with TDB's.
Andy
On 27/08/13 19:20, Claude Warren wrote:
+1
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote:
Since we all seem to be in agreement that the next release will be 2.11.0
rather than 2.10.2 because of all the new stuff we're putting in do we want
to go ahead and bump the versions in the POMs?
Do we also want to bump versions for components like TDB that don't use
2.10.2 e.g. 0.10.2 => 0.11.0
I will happily volunteer to do this
Rob
