On 04/09/13 18:25, Rob Vesse wrote:
Perhaps, I only have so much energy to follow the machinations of W3C
working groups so am unsure where things have got to with the linked data
platform PATCH discussions.
I haven't had time and so have had to drop out of the activity of the WG.
"Submission" is a way of getting it on the record/radar. It does not
equate to action.
Right now the archive of this new list is empty so I assume past
discussions are in the main LDP mailing lists?
Yes - I think it was created a few days ago after an extra meeting the
LDP-WG held with TimBL. Looks like PATCH was identified as a high
priority matter (I'm doing off misc emails I've bumped into - I wasn't
at the meeting).
Andy
Rob
On 9/4/13 6:25 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote:
I wonder if we should put the cat amongst the pigeons and submit RDF
patch as a W3C member submission.
Andy
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: public-ldp-patch list created
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:10:42 +0000
Resent-From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:10:33 -0400
From: Sandro Hawke <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], Tim Berners-Lee <[email protected]>
As discussed at the last telecon (ACTION-92), I created
[email protected]
To subscribe yourself, use this link:
subscribe to this list
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
that is, send mail with the subject "subscribe" to
[email protected]
I'm writing a summary of issues to send shortly. When you join, you
should probably look at what's been sent already (if anything):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-patch/
The list is open to everyone, but of course we expect usual w3c
decorum. Also, any technical contributions from non-ldp-WG members need
to be handled was some care due to IPR concerns.
-- Sandro
