Andy, Ying, Sorry for taking so long to respond! I had some errant email filters that I adjusted.
You are handling the JTS library optional-dependency correctly, yes. The next version of Spatial4j will have built-in WKT parsing support (already in-progress) and hopefully not too far off is a polygon implementation that isn't LGPL licensed JTS. ~ David On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > Ying has made good progress with building the spatial extension for Jena. > > It's the process issue of dealing with the JTS library that I wanted to > check with you. > > We'll have a JTS-free build and document how the user can also include > JTS. Is that best way to handle it? > > Andy >
