Ah, OK.   I'll give that a try then.  Thanks for the heads-up.

Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM


On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15/11/13 05:59, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>>
>> FWIW... I just grabbed the Jena source, imported it into my workspace
>> and set my project to reference that, so I could debug into this as
>> it's running. What I see is the code getting to line 864 in RDFDataMgr
>> and executing this code:
>>
>> parser = RiotReader.createParser(tokenizer, lang, base, output) ;
>>
>> which returns null.  The next line tries to use the null reference,
>> and hence the NPE.
>>
>> Looking at RiotReader.createParser(), I don't see anything in there
>> that mentions JSON-LD at all.    But the docs for java-jsonld say
>> something like:
>>
>> "JenaJSONLD must be initialized so that the readers and writers are
>> registered with Jena."  and I do call the init() method.  But I don't
>> see how that registration process plays with this createParser() code.
>>
>> I'm guessing things have just gotten out of sync between Jena and the
>> JSON-LD stuff?
>
>
> The problem is reading from a reader (I should have noticed this earlier in
> the thread).
>
> If you use an InputStream it will work (= it does for me).
>
> Readers are troublesome because they fix the charset before Jena gets a
> chance set the encodign according to syntax.  A FileReader is particularly
> troublesome because it fixes the charset as the system default so if that is
> not UTF-8 (and it isn't on Windows) it will not be UTF-8.
>
> StringReader is only usecase but it currently follows a hardwired path
> inside RDFDataMgr.  The general ReaderRIOT interface does not have Readers.
>
> Regrettably, I think I'll have to go and add Readers to ReaderRIOT (it only
> results in parallel code - InputStream and Reader have no commonality) just
> because of StringReader.
>
> You should be able to pass the input stream from HTTP request to the
> RDFDataMgr or model.read directly.
>
>         Andy
>
>> Phil
>
>

Reply via email to