[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13856400#comment-13856400
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-616:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1553306 from [~andy.seaborne] in branch 'jena/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1553306 ]

JENA-595 , JENA-432 , JENA-616 , JENA-293 , JENA-383

Put filter equality rewrite after filter placement because
it may then be possible to apply it when it could not when
covering a larger pattern.

Modify some test that were sensitive to this.

> Order of FILTER placement and FILTER equality transformation can be 
> sub-optimal.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-616
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-616
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.10.1
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Jena 2.11.1
>
>
> In Jena 2.11.0, the equality transform is done before the filter placement.
> This order of applying these two optimizations is not optimal if the filter 
> placement enables the equality transform where it was not going to be applied 
> before. 
> JENA-595 pushes filter placement more deeply inside compound patterns so it 
> is possible that the filter now applies to a smaller pattern where the 
> equality transform is now valid.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to