[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13939138#comment-13939138
]
Natanael Arndt commented on JENA-656:
-------------------------------------
`application/json` and `application/xml` where not handled at this point.
Yes, I think it is not good to encourage bad behavior but I think it is better
for the interoperability to accept it. In my patch the quality is set to 0.5
for those types.
> Doesn't send all accepted mime types in header
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-656
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-656
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ARQ
> Affects Versions: Jena 2.11.1
> Reporter: Natanael Arndt
> Attachments: 0001-Fix-JENA-656.-Improve-mime-type-handling.patch
>
>
> The Jena HTTP query engine doesn't send all the mime types it can process in
> the accept header. It would be better if it could send all of them, so
> services can send a better response.
> Currently the HTTP-Accept-Header claims that jena can only accept
> "application/sparql-results+xml" resp. "application/rdf+xml" as query result.
> In fact it can process much more types.
> Furthermore some services [1] will return a more general content-type in the
> header when answering a request (e.g. "application/json" instead of
> "application/sparql-results+xml" or "application/xml" instead of
> "application/rdf+xml"). It would be good to also try to parse such results
> and to see if the content can be interpreted as SPARQL result.
> [1] http://rdf.myexperiment.org/sparql/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
