[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13993504#comment-13993504
 ] 

Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-691 at 5/12/14 12:59 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Possible categories:

* queries (not for Fuseki logging - that is better done with Fuseki's logs 
which include code for an NCSA format log output)
* algebra from query, before and after algebra optimization
* execution of algebra
** Some degree of extensibility for new engines to add their own categories
* Remote requests
** Direct remote call from the application e.g. 
{{QueryExecutionFactory.sparqlService}}
** From within a query e.g. {{SERVICE}}



was (Author: andy.seaborne):
Possible categories:

* queries (not for Fuseki logging - that is better done with Fuseki's logs 
which include code for an NCSA format log output)
* algebra from query, before and after algebra optimization
* execution of algebra
** Some degree of extensibility for new engines to add their own categories
* Remote requests
** Direct remote call from the application e.g. 
`QueryExecutionFactory.sparqlService`
** From within a query e.g. `SERVICE`


> "Explain" Categories
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-691
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-691
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>
> "Explain" capabilities in ARQ are provided like logging levels with levels 
> ALL, INFO, FINE and NONE. For example, Algebra is printed at level FINE but 
> that implies level INFO, which includes queries.  
> Instead, categories would be better so that a "mix and match" of various 
> explanations could be set to give a more focused output.
> This JIRA is for collecting suggestions, requests and contributions for a 
> more extensive "Explain" capability.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to