A minor correction to be noted for those attempting to review, the link to the proposed distribution is incorrect
Correct link is http://people.apache.org/~andy/Jena-2.12.0/ Rob On 26/07/2014 21:19, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >Here is a vote on a release of Jena 2.12.0 with Fuseki artifact >1.1.0. > >This the first release of Jena that requires Java 7. > >Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >(We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > >Staging repository: >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1003/ > >Proposed dist/ area: >http://people.apache.org/~afs/Jena-2.12.0/ > >Keys: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > >SVN tag: >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.12.0 > >Dependency Changes since previous release 2.11.2 > > json-ldjava 0.4 -> 0.5.0 > > >Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > >This vote will be open to the end of > > Tuesday, 29th July, 2014 23:59 UTC > >(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > Andy > > >Checking needed: > >+ does everything work on Linux? >+ does everything work on MS Windows? >+ does everything work on OS X? >+ is the GPG signature fine? >+ are the checksums correct? >+ is there a source archive? >+ can the source archive really be built? >+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? >+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? >+ does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? >
