Due to various issues discovered with the release candidate this vote is now cancelled.
You are still invited to check this release candidate in case there are other issues that need addressing. Can the relevant developers please take a look at and try and address the various issues Andy has raised with the release candidate. I will plan on rolling a new release candidate tomorrow unless anyone seriously objects Thanks, Rob On 30/09/2014 15:09, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >Here is a vote on a release of Jena 2.12.1 with Fuseki artifact >1.1.1 > >Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >(We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > >Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1005/ > >Proposed dist/ area: > http://people.apache.org/~rvesse/jena-2.12.1/ > >Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > >Git commit (web browser URL): > >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=db72eb8d5ad4 >8 >2e92b7b28d39b8911941d155267 > >Git Commit Hash: > db72eb8d5ad482e92b7b28d39b8911941d155267 > >Git Commit Tag: > jena-2.12.1 > >Dependency Changes since previous release: > commons-csv - 1.0 - new > libthrift - 0.9.1 - new > >Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > >This vote will be open to the end of > > Friday, 3rd October, 2014 23:59 UTC > >(72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > >Thanks, > >Rob > >Checking needed: > >+ does everything work on Linux? >+ does everything work on MS Windows? >+ does everything work on OS X? >+ is the GPG signature fine? >+ are the checksums correct? >+ is there a source archive? >+ can the source archive really be built? >+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? >+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? >+ does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > > > >
