Fine tuning our processes ...Rob is now ahead with "[??/93]" :-) OK - he's sub-contracted the work of the actually commit to others.
Is there anyway we can stop this?
Is there a better way to merge two branches in git?
Andy
Fine tuning our processes ...Rob is now ahead with "[??/93]" :-) OK - he's sub-contracted the work of the actually commit to others.
Is there anyway we can stop this?
Is there a better way to merge two branches in git?
Andy