Looks like an OS issues indeed Andy. Build works fine on my Windows box. c:\Users\kinow\Downloads\jena-master>mvn clean test -e -X Apache Maven 3.2.3 (33f8c3e1027c3ddde99d3cdebad2656a31e8fdf4; 2014-08-11T17:58:1 0-03:00) Maven home: C:\dev\apache-maven-3.2.3 Java version: 1.7.0_71, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\dev\jdk-7u71-windows-x64\jre Default locale: pt_BR, platform encoding: Cp1252 OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
(...) [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache Jena - Parent ............................... SUCCESS [ 11.715 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - IRI .................................. SUCCESS [ 13.274 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Core ................................. SUCCESS [04:18 min] [INFO] Apache Jena - ARQ (SPARQL 1.1 Query Engine) ........ SUCCESS [01:59 min] [INFO] Apache Jena - TDB (Native Triple Store) ............ SUCCESS [01:00 min] [INFO] Apache Jena - Libraries POM ........................ SUCCESS [ 0.874 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - SPARQL Text Search ................... SUCCESS [ 39.652 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - SPARQL Spatial Search ................ SUCCESS [ 20.281 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Data Tables for RDF and SPARQL ....... SUCCESS [ 14.909 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - SDB (SQL based triple store) ......... SUCCESS [ 50.005 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Fuseki1 (SPARQL 1.1 Server) .......... SUCCESS [ 33.137 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Fuseki ............................... SUCCESS [ 0.233 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Fuseki Server Engine ................. SUCCESS [ 34.061 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Fuseki WAR File ...................... SUCCESS [ 2.013 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Fuseki Server Standalone Jar ......... SUCCESS [ 1.944 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Fuseki Binary Distribution ........... SUCCESS [ 1.566 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Security ............................. SUCCESS [ 20.831 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - JDBC Parent .......................... SUCCESS [ 3.368 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - JDBC Core API ........................ SUCCESS [ 8.339 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - JDBC Remote Endpoint Driver .......... SUCCESS [ 22.591 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - JDBC In-Memory Driver ................ SUCCESS [ 12.732 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - JDBC TDB Driver ...................... SUCCESS [02:17 min] [INFO] Apache Jena - JDBC Driver Bundle ................... SUCCESS [ 12.761 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Maven Plugins, including schemagen ... SUCCESS [01:50 min] [INFO] Apache Jena - Distribution ......................... SUCCESS [ 1.056 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Extras ............................... SUCCESS [ 0.227 s] [INFO] Apache Jena - Extras - Query Builder ............... SUCCESS [ 28.749 s] [INFO] Apache Jena ........................................ SUCCESS [ 15.301 s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 17:17 min [INFO] Finished at: 2015-01-20T10:06:06-02:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 71M/421M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bruno >________________________________ > From: Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 8:52 AM >Subject: Windows build issues > > >This is repeatedly going wrong and I'm not sure why. > >On the surface, it looks like there is a rogue Jetty sitting on port >3535 which then blocks the tests. > >But: >1/ Tracing back to the last job to run at all (#507), it's some TDB/JDBC >tests failing for weird low level reasons. > >2/ Switch between windows1 and windows2 slaves today gets nasty file >errors (various flavours - some clearly jenkins problems) > >3/ I can't even wipe the workspace at the moment. > >so my guess is that OS resources are the problem and we can't fix them. > I've email builds@ to ask for help and disabled the job for now. > >We might be contributing to the problems; the windows builds being >resource hungry for mmap files, but the job was running fine for quite >some time until #507 and I can't see any change that might be connected. > > Andy > > >
