Thank you so much for your suggestion Andy. I have started working on 2a.
Regards Saikat On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello Claude, Andy, >> >> In reference to your email I would like to discuss the way I am looking >> forward to implement the Cache Layer. >> >> 1. We will be creating a global cache store based on config params passed >> via cache.properties. >> 2. Users will have option to select any of the following cache store as >> default >> a) In memory local cache >> b) remote in memory cache >> c) remote in memory cache with persistence in disk >> 3. We will update SPARQL_QUERY to read query results from cache if >> available and if the ResultSet is within valid time to live. >> 4. If cache has expired we will run executeQuery and repopulate the cache >> with updated time to live. >> 5. We will add Tests to validate different cache store operations. >> 6. I am still evaluating the changes required to accommodate different >> datasets. >> >> Please let me know if there are changes required in the implementation. >> >> Regards >> Saikat >> > > Hi Saikat, > > The plan looks good. > > One suggestion is to start simple. > > For example, get 2a working first, maybe with hardwired config, focus on > getting that working end-to-end then go back and handle 2b and 2c and 1. > > By working on just one case, you'll validate the framework into which 2b > and 2c have to fit. > > And it's nice to have something working as soon as possible :-) > > Tests - good! > > Andy > > >
