I would be happy having Fuseki 2 included in 2.13.0 as an Alpha/Beta release
I am tended to go with the "release early, release often" approach. We know Fuseki 2 is going to be a big change for people and that it isn't all going to work yet but that shouldn't stop us putting it in the hands of people and getting real world feedback Rob On 03/03/2015 21:07, "Ian Dickinson" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi folks, >Firstly an apology for dropping off the radar for a while. I've been >very busy with work, so haven't been attending to dev@ emails for a >while. > >Anyway, I'm picking up the reins again on the Fuseki2 UI work. I >notice that there are a number of bug reports outstanding, thanks for >those whoever contributed to them. There are also some unfinished >threads on the originally planned Fuseki2 UI capabilities (some of >which will need back-end support via the server protocol). Finally >there have been some changes that have been introduced by some of the >patches that have gone through while my attention has been elsewhere, >some of which have negatively impacted existing capabilities. > >Tl;dr - there's quite a bit of work to do to bring the Fuseki2 UI up >to where I'd like it to be, including closing out the new bugreps. > >One of the reasons for bringing this to the list is with respect to >the forthcoming release. I can't get the outstanding work done in a >timeframe that will do anything other than delay this release. Given >my other work commitments, it's going to be O(weeks) before the work >queue that I can see on Fuseki2 is under control. We have a choice >about what to do about that. One option would be to include the >current UI as-is, but label it more clearly as an alpha release. >Another would be to decouple the new UI from this release, but aim for >another release in O(months) when Fuseki2 is up to a good standard. >There may be other options between those extremes. > >Opinions? > >Ian
