[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14349611#comment-14349611
]
Ian Dickinson commented on JENA-890:
------------------------------------
I'm going to ignore your absurd straw man argument, except to note that it's
not an effective way to participate in a collaborative discussion. I'm happy to
have a reasoned discussion; I don't care about bluster.
To the actual point: it doesn't really matter whether you spent 45 seconds or
45 minutes writing a paragraph of explanatory text - people in general won't
read it. There's plenty of research to back that up. Here's a sample:
http://www.nngroup.com/articles/satisficing/
http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-users-read-on-the-web/
http://www.uxbooth.com/articles/10-usability-lessons-from-steve-krugs-dont-make-me-think/
notes 1-3
http://guidelines.usability.gov/guidelines/172
> Pivot table in Fuseki2 has confusing design and user experience
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-890
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Fuseki
> Affects Versions: Fuseki 2.0.0
> Reporter: Ian Dickinson
>
> The SPARQL query tab on the Fuseki2 interface has an option in the results
> pane labelled 'pivot table'. It's very, very unclear what this does. It
> appears to be an experimental feature of some kind, but it does not provide a
> clear, discoverable user experience. In fact, after playing with it for some
> minutes, I still can't figure out what it is actually for.
> I suggest that either the UX of this feature is radically improved, or we
> remove it from Fuseki2 until it is ready for wider exposure.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
