-1: Release notes not updated. Everything else fine.
WARNING: Release notes are missing for 2.13.0 source/jena-2.13.0/jena-core/ReleaseNotes.txt binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0/ReleaseNotes-Jena.txt does NOT mention 2.12.1 or 2.13.0 + are the checksums correct? You didn't say what is the hash of the source-release.zip, so I have assumed the below: sha1: 9b51356e847f1f40368704470aced6a61da6d6e5 jena-2.13.0-source-release.zip f11a0531e61575f56f11bc8a7c56605fdb618786 apache-jena-2.13.0.tar.gz fad0683eb2cbcef1337f07494dcbde51d1776f1b apache-jena-2.13.0.zip 57e5fbde8802bc328ed3213af414bb459a047c22 apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.tar.gz 9e871762ebfc903e218a0098d43fbe9b46c49212 apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.zip e22d7dfe6b427de267642fe7dc2141ab662db24b jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.tar.gz 845d2b1fe5573a173460f230127fe13b3c057e17 jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.zip md5: 1dbc545225588c3fe6bf43b62f8def5b jena-2.13.0-source-release.zip 92f5cedc7b1e3d04946c24365871a362 apache-jena-2.13.0.tar.gz 016fad436b0b07796e003797cd1906b7 apache-jena-2.13.0.zip a51e7df978e5e7e989be31e05c7fe1d4 apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.tar.gz b8facd59d4f51d299a62c653f46f1967 apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.zip 29c20a1ca615258cb2e615f1c2ff367a jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.tar.gz d44c4bf801e705aba800a4ba7c01dc6e jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.zip + is there a source archive? Yes! + does everything work on Linux? Tested on Ubuntu 14.10 x64 with stain@biggie-utopic:/tmp/jena/people.apache.org/~andy/jena-2.13.0-rc1/source$ java -version java version "1.7.0_75" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.5.4) (7u75-2.5.4-1~utopic1) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.75-b04, mixed mode) Not sure which 'everything' to test.. so I tested Fuseki 2 binary distribution. zip and tar.gz matches in content. ./fuseki-server starts and works - writing to ./run Tested in the UI to create new dataset, uploading of two *.ttl.gz and trying the two default queries. Backup works - also restore into a new dataset with the expected number of triples. I also tested using Jena from Apache Taverna Language by modifying our parent to use 2.13.0 and the <repository> - all our tests pass OK + does everything work on MS Windows? Not tested + does everything work on OS X? Not tested + is the GPG signature fine? gpg: Signature made Sun 08 Mar 2015 10:27:38 GMT using RSA key ID 9CC7ECFE gpg: Good signature from "Andy Seaborne (Code signing key) <[email protected]>" 9CC7ECFE is in KEYS Signature verified for: jena-2.13.0-source-release.zip.asc apache-jena-2.13.0.tar.gz.asc apache-jena-2.13.0.zip.asc apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.tar.gz.asc apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.zip.asc jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.tar.gz.asc jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.zip.asc All *.asc in the Maven repository verify as well. + can the source archive really be built? Yes, but it does take a while to run all the Elephas I/O tests.. :) Tested with Docker image maven:3-jdk-7 bf326e841380 (with an empty .m2/repository) root@294bc7afa18a:/# java -version java version "1.7.0_75" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.5.4) (7u75-2.5.4-2) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.75-b04, mixed mode) root@294bc7afa18a:/# mvn -version Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1; 2014-12-14T17:29:23+00:00) Maven home: /usr/share/maven Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: ANSI_X3.4-1968 OS name: "linux", version: "3.16.0-31-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" > .. > [INFO] Apache Jena - JDBC TDB Driver ...................... SUCCESS [02:07 > min] > .. > [INFO] Apache Jena - Elephas - I/O ........................ SUCCESS [16:29 > min] > .. > [INFO] Total time: 28:15 min The build produces JARs which filenames (e.g. jena-jdbc-driver-mem-1.1.2.jar) match each of the JAR filenames in https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1008/ (I did not check -javadoc -tests and -sources) + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source and binary artifacts)? I am unable to say they are correct, but comprehensive LICENSE and NOTICE files are present in: source/jena-2.13.0-source-release.zip binaries/apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.zip binaries/jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.zip binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0.zip + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? Not checked. + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? Not checked. + does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? Yes. ecaa41eefdcb79f16bd4b9525b89309f8282ca47 matches tag jena-2.13.0-rc1 and (almost) all files in the content of the source distribution matches the git repository stain@biggie-utopic:/tmp/jena$ diff -ur jena-git jena-src Only in jena-src: DEPENDENCIES Only in jena-git: .gitignore Only in jena-git/jena-arq: .gitattributes Only in jena-git/jena-arq/Grammar: .gitignore Only in jena-git/jena-fuseki1: .gitignore Only in jena-git/jena-fuseki2: .gitignore Only in jena-src/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-server: dependency-reduced-pom.xml Only in jena-git/jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-server: .gitignore Only in jena-git/jena-text: .gitignore On 8 March 2015 at 12:12, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on a release of Jena 2.13.0. > > This is the first release candidate for this release. > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1008/ > > Proposed dist/ area: > http://people.apache.org/~andy/jena-2.13.0-rc1 > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > Git commit (web browser URL): > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=ecaa41eefdcb79f16bd4b9525b89309f8282ca47 > > NB - Text wrapping may mangle the above URL > > Git Commit Hash: > ecaa41eefdcb79f16bd4b9525b89309f8282ca47 > > Git Commit Tag: > jena-2.13.0-rc1 > > New since last release: > Elephas > Fuseki2 > OSGi > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > This vote will be open to at least the end of > > Thursday, 12th March 2014, 23:59 UTC > > (96 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > This is a major release. If you expect to check the release but ythe the 96 > hour limit does not work for you, please email within the schedule above > with an expected time. > > Thanks, > > Andy > > Checking needed: > > + does everything work on Linux? > + does everything work on MS Windows? > + does everything work on OS X? > + is the GPG signature fine? > + are the checksums correct? > + is there a source archive? > + can the source archive really be built? > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > > > > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
