+1

..conditional on future retirement of ReleaseNotes
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-896

This vote supersedes
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201503.mbox/%3CCAMBJEmWfFmVmr6o9d-nogSWK50YcdFO741g4ngvKiNDYenoDTg%40mail.gmail.com%3E

On 9 March 2015 at 13:43, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on the release of Jena 2.13.0.
>
> This is the second vote call on the first release candidate. This call adds
> the checksums for the dist/ items omitted in the first VOTE call.
>
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
>
> We need at least a majority and 3 +1's from the PMC but the more it's
> tested, the better.
>
> Staging repository:
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1008/
>
> Proposed dist/ area:
>   http://people.apache.org/~andy/jena-2.13.0-rc1
>
> Keys:
>   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
>
> MD5 and SHA1 checksums below.
>
> Git commit (web browser URL):
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h=ecaa41eefdcb79f16bd4b9525b89309f8282ca47
>
>   NB - Text wrapping may mangle the above URL
>
> Git Commit Hash:
>   ecaa41eefdcb79f16bd4b9525b89309f8282ca47
>
> Git Commit Tag:
>   jena-2.13.0-rc1
>
> New since last release:
>   Elephas
>   Fuseki2
>   OSGi
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
>   [ ] +1 Approve the release
>   [ ]  0 Don't care
>   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to at least the end of
>
>   Thursday, 12th March 2014, 23:59 UTC
>
> (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC).
>
> This is a major release.  If you expect to check the release but the the 72
> hour limit does not work for you, please email within the schedule above
> with an expected time.
>
> Thanks,
>
>     Andy
>
> Checking needed:
>
> + does everything work on Linux?
> + does everything work on MS Windows?
> + does everything work on OS X?
> + is the GPG signature fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
> + can the source archive really be built?
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>     (both source and binary artifacts)?
> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>      if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> + does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>
> release checksums:
>
> source/jena-2.13.0-source-release.zip.sha1
> 9b51356e847f1f40368704470aced6a61da6d6e5
>
> source/jena-2.13.0-source-release.zip.md5
> 1dbc545225588c3fe6bf43b62f8def5b
>
>
> binaries checksums:
>
> binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0.tar.gz.sha1
> f11a0531e61575f56f11bc8a7c56605fdb618786
>
> binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0.zip.sha1
> fad0683eb2cbcef1337f07494dcbde51d1776f1b
>
> binaries/apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.tar.gz.sha1
> 57e5fbde8802bc328ed3213af414bb459a047c22
>
> binaries/apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.zip.sha1
> 9e871762ebfc903e218a0098d43fbe9b46c49212
>
> binaries/jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.tar.gz.sha1
> e22d7dfe6b427de267642fe7dc2141ab662db24b
>
> binaries/jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.zip.sha1
> 845d2b1fe5573a173460f230127fe13b3c057e17
>
> binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0.tar.gz.md5
> 92f5cedc7b1e3d04946c24365871a362
>
> binaries/apache-jena-2.13.0.zip.md5
> 016fad436b0b07796e003797cd1906b7
>
> binaries/apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.tar.gz.md5
> a51e7df978e5e7e989be31e05c7fe1d4
>
> binaries/apache-jena-fuseki-2.0.0.zip.md5
> b8facd59d4f51d299a62c653f46f1967
>
> binaries/jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.tar.gz.md5
> 29c20a1ca615258cb2e615f1c2ff367a
>
> binaries/jena-fuseki1-1.1.2-distribution.zip.md5
> d44c4bf801e705aba800a4ba7c01dc6e
>
>
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

Reply via email to