[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14372332#comment-14372332
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-901:
-------------------------------------

GitHub user stain opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/45

    Guava as shaded dependency

    (Pull request mainly for discussion)
    
    Add Guava as a shaded dependency in a new module `jena-shadowed-ext` 
    that can then be used by `jena-core` for 
[JENA-901](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-901).
    
    As this means `jena-core` gets a new dependencies (even our own!), and we 
have been shot down before for adding those in patch releases, this means a new 
minor version on anything from `jena-core` and downstream.
    
    I did not use this shaded jar within Elephas as it does not itself use 
Guava - Elephas does however have conflicting version dependencies on Guava 
11.0.2 (from provided hadoop-common 2.6.0), 16.0.1 (from curator-client) and 
18.0 (from airline dependency in jena-elephas-stats). I therefore changed 
`jena-elephas`  outdated dependencyManagement on 11.0.2 to [18.0,)  -- although 
this could be reduced to 16 as jena-elephas-stats is a demo-app and it can 
upgrade to 18 locally in its own pom (ideally airline etc. should themselves 
use ranges)
    


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/stain/jena guava

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/45.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #45
    
----
commit 623543a6c31a255d83be0bdb525c09a2f7fd0fac
Author: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-03-20T23:13:49Z

    jena-shadowed-ext containing guava 18.0

commit e8b53617dbb23eedb335a4f2ef3677e9607d1f00
Author: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-03-20T23:24:22Z

    Ignore dependency-reduced-pom.xml
    
    Setting <dependencyReducedPomLocation>target/dependency-reduced-pom.xml 
might also work,
    but see
    
    
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/shade-mojo.html#dependencyReducedPomLocation

commit a0a75f46dbef59cf389cb1a53c5ed345ca63bd21
Author: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-03-20T23:25:27Z

    Bump minor versions as jena-core gains a dependency

commit 07b65e0f1e6024a0e9735e5ab497aae349d3f70b
Author: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-03-20T23:27:41Z

    typo

----


> Make the cache of LPBRuleEngine bounded to avoid out-of-memory
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-901
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-901
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Reasoners
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.12.1
>            Reporter: Jan De Beer
>
> The class "com.hp.hpl.jena.reasoner.rulesys.impl.LPBRuleEngine" uses an 
> in-memory cache named "tabledGoals", which has no limit as to the size/number 
> of entries stored.
> {noformat}
>     /** Table mapping tabled goals to generators for those goals.
>      *  This is here so that partial goal state can be shared across multiple 
> queries. */
>     protected HashMap<TriplePattern, Generator> tabledGoals = new HashMap<>();
> {noformat}
> We have experienced out-of-memory issues because of the cache being filled 
> with millions of entries in just a few days under normal query usage 
> conditions and a heap memory set to 3GB.
> In our setup, we have a dataset containing multiple graphs, some of them are 
> actual data graphs (backed by TDB), and then there are two which are ontology 
> models using a "TransitiveReasoner" and an "OWLMicroFBRuleReasoner", 
> respectively. A typical query may run over all the graphs in the dataset, 
> including the ontology ones (see below for a query template). Eventhough the 
> ontology graphs would not yield any additional results for data queries 
> (which is fine), the above mentioned cache would still fill up with new 
> entries.
> {noformat}
> SELECT ?p ?o
> WHERE {
>   GRAPH ?g {
>     <some resource of interest> ?p ?o .
>   }
> }
> {noformat}
> As there is no upper bound to the cache, soon or later all available heap 
> memory will be consumed by the cache, giving rise to an out-of-memory 
> criticial error.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to