On 02/04/15 09:58, Sergio Fernández wrote:
Hi,
because the topic came out in another mailing list [1], I've quickly
started to prepare the Debian packaging of Fuseki2. We are using that
approach in Marmotta [2] for quite a while. and I hope you find it useful.
The implementation is actually rather easy [3], and only affect the build
system (it based on a maven plugin), so it's integrated in the package
phase.
It should be already working, so early feedback is welcomed. But during the
following days I'll try to polish few details and send a formal patch
attached to a jira issue.
Cheers,
[1] http://markmail.org/message/ovgxrnxp5oi47xbz
[2] http://marmotta.apache.org/installation#deb
[3] https://github.com/apache/jena/compare/master...wikier:master
Hi Sergio,
Very interesting. It would be good to add a ".deb" to delivery binaries.
Everyone,
A few discussion points:
In the naming, there is:
"/usr/share/jena/fuseki2/fuseki2.war"
1/ Maybe "fuseki" rather than "fuseki2" because there is no fuseki1 by
this route. (Yes - it is /usr/share/tomcat8)
fuseki2.war means the webass name is "fuseki2".
2/ "jena/fuseki" - not sure what's best here.
Would "/usr/share/fuseki" be better?
"/usr/share/jena-fuseki"
"/usr/share/apache-jena-fuseki"
3/ What's the style about directories like "/etc/fuseki" - should they
be created?
5/ (stretch goal!) Fuseki requires Java7 and the java version thing is
already causing confusion. Can the installation test what java tomcat
is running or is that too ambitious?
Andy
