For your specific case no I don't think so No RDF serialisation (other than possibly our non-standard RDF/Thrift) allows for anonymous predicates so this would fail regardless of the underlying serialisation AFAIK
Rob On 28/04/2015 22:47, "Claude Warren" <[email protected]> wrote: >I'm not sure this is an error so I thought I'd see what the consensus is >here before I do anything. > >My understanding is that the Graph interface has no restrictions on the >types of objects in the subject, predicate or object. That is that I >could >store an anonymous node as the predicate in a triple even though this is >not allowed in a model. > >The FileGraph implementation uses a model internally and when it writes >the >data out the model restrictions seem to apply -- that is I can not store >an >anonymous node as a predicate. > >All other graphs tested thus far allow saving the anonymous node as a >predicate. > >It may be that the format of the output is enforcing the restrictions. I >am currently using a TURTLE format. However any functional format would >be >acceptable. Is there a way to write the filegraph output when the graph >does not meet the model restrictions? > >Claude > >-- >I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web ><http://like-like.xenei.com> >LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
